OnlineFirst

Pianistic memorization has long been treated as an expectation, a marker of virtuosity, or a source of performance anxiety, yet its deeper cultural and symbolic meanings remain largely unexamined. This article reframes memorized performance through the lens of religious and devotional memory practices, drawing on scholarship in cultural memory, cognitive psychology, and nineteenth-century performance history. Across Christian, Islamic, Buddhist, and Jewish traditions, memorization functions not merely as retention but as a transformative, embodied discipline through which texts are internalized, enacted, and carried forward in communal identity. Placing pianistic memory in dialogue with these traditions illuminates how learning music by heart involves similar processes of internalization, embodiment, and meaning-making. Historical analysis traces how memorization became entrenched in nineteenth-century concert culture, while cognitive research highlights the layered systems of analytical, auditory, visual, and kinesthetic memory through which pianists build secure performance. Integrating these perspectives reveals that memorized performance is not simply a technical requirement but a form of cultural participation with implications for canon formation, pedagogy, and performer identity. Considered alongside religious traditions, pianistic memorization emerges not as an outdated convention but as a culturally meaningful discipline that shapes interpretation, repertoire, and artistic identity. This reframing encourages a broader understanding of what it means to internalize a musical work and situates pianistic memory within a much older human lineage of devotional and embodied memorization.

Piano technique is considered significant to performance quality and the prevention of playing-related injuries. Both teachers and researchers stand to benefit from exchanging knowledge on this topic. However, differences in biomechanical and technical terminology can pose challenges for communicating and scientifically evaluating ideas about piano technique. Therefore, it would be beneficial to translate terminology across disciplines to allow successful knowledge exchanges. This study addresses linguistic difficulties related to the Taubman Approach to piano technique, which has gained prominence as a pedagogical approach. A two-stage qualitative method was used to extract key ideas from Taubman Approach sources, and to translate them into scientific language. Findings are given for two main categories related to curling the fingers: 1) What is curling? and 2) Does curling lead to physical/musical problems? The biomechanical translation of Taubman Approach sources suggests that curling involves flexing the distal interphalangeal joints by activating extrinsic flexor muscles. Further, curling while playing the piano may increase co-contraction and stiffness across the wrist/finger joints, inhibiting movement in multiple planes and potentially leading to technical limitations and/or injury. This study provides an example of how pedagogical language can be translated into scientific language. These findings can clarify concepts, help bridge communication gaps, and provide a basis for further research on piano technique and injury development. Findings can also help teachers better understand Taubman’s concept of curling, and why she believed it should be avoided. Finally, findings provide teachers with anatomical and biomechanical concepts that can help their students better understand piano technique.